Food Science and Technology

ISSN-print: 2073-8684
ISSN-online: 2409-7004
ISO: 26324:2012

“Lving” and “probiotic” cosmetics: modern view and defenitions


N. Tkachenko
O. Chagarovskyi
N. Dets
E. Sevastyanova
L. Lanzhenko


In the presented article, based on the detailed analysis of scientific sources and many years of own experience in production of the probiotic foods, the definition of “probiotics” in cosmetics, as well as the definition of “living” and “probiotic” cosmetics is proposed.

The skin is a complex barrier organ that has a symbiotic relationship between microbial communities and host tissue via complex signals provided by the innate and the adaptive immune systems. It is constantly exposed to various endogenous and exogenous factors – physical, chemical, bacterial and fungal, as well as the effects of the hormonal disorders, which affect this balanced system potentially leading to inflammatory skin conditions comprising infections, allergies or autoimmune diseases. In opposition to the gut and stool microbiome, which has been studied and described for many years, investigations on the skin or scalp microbiome lasts only for last 10 years. Therefore, the screening of effective means of correcting and/or maintaining the human normoflora for the preservation of healthy skin microbiome today is an urgent task.

It is well known that probiotics and prebiotics are helpful for specific disorders in the human body. Skeptics wonder: can the probiotics and prebiotics be scientifically applied in cosmetics? Different clinical studies indicated that they have special effects in cutaneous apparatus directly or indirectly, which can be considered from different aspects. Probiotic bacteriotherapy can have great potential in accelerating wound healing, in preventing and treating the skin diseases including eczema, atopic dermatitis, acne, allergic inflammation or skin hypersensitivity, UV-induced skin damage and cosmetics products. Therefore, some firms are already incorporating bacteria and/or their lysates into skin creams with the promise of «rebalancing» the community of bacteria that live in the human body and delivering healthier, more radiant-looking skin. However, such parameters as the type of probiotic, the form in which it is added to the formulation (living bacteria, lysates, etc.) and the recommended concentrations of these ingredients in cosmetic products that are safe and effective are still not defined. Due to currently widespread use of probiotic cosmetic products in the world beauty industry, the concept of "probiotic" in the cosmetic industry requires a clear definition.

Ключові слова:
Для цієї мови відсутні ключові слова


Як цитувати
Tkachenko, N., Chagarovskyi, O., Dets, N., Sevastyanova, E., & Lanzhenko, L. (2017). “Lving” and “probiotic” cosmetics: modern view and defenitions. Food Science and Technology, 11(4).
Парфумерно-косметичні продукти: інгредієнти, рецептури, інновації та технологі
Біографія автора

N. Tkachenko, Одеська національна академія харчових технологій

Кафедра харчової хімії, доцент


1. Dreno B. et al. Microbiome in healthy skin, update for dermatologists: Review article. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016; 30(12):2038 – 2047.

2. Rahmati Roudsari M., Karimi R., Mortazavian A.M. Health effects of probiotics on the skin. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2015; 55(9):79.

3. Michael de Vrese, Schrezenmeir J. Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics. Food Biotechnology. 2008; 5:1–66.

4. Didukh NA, Chaharovskyi OP, Lysohor TA. Zakvashuval`ni kompozytsii dlia vyrobnytstva molochnykh produktiv funktsional`noho pryznachennia. Odessa: Vydavnytstvo Polihraf; 2008. ISBN 978–966–8788–79–6

5. Tkachenko NA, et al. Zakvashuval'ni kompozytsiyi dlya dytyachykh kyslomolochnykh produktiv z pidvyshchenymy proteolitychnymy vlastyvostyamy. Skhidno-Yevropeys'kyy zhurnal peredovykh tekhnolohiy. 2014; 2/12(68):66–71. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2014.23388

6. Tkachenko NA. Zakvashuval'ni kompozytsiyi bakteriy dlya tekhnolohiy kyslomolochnykh produktiv dytyachoho kharchuvannya. Mikrobiolohiya i biotekhnolohiya. 2016; 1:55–67.

7. Gueniche A, Bastien P, Ovigne JM. Bifidobacterium longum lysate, a new ingredient for reactive skin. Exp. Dermatol. 2010; 19:1–8.

8. Elias PM, Choi EH. Interactions among stratum cormeum defensive functions. Exp. Dermatol. 2005; 14:719–726.

9. Pillsbury DM, Shelley WB. Dermatology. Annu Rev Med. 1954; 5:363–388.

10. Ianiro G. et al. Therapeutic modulation of gut microbiota: current clinical applications and future perspectives. Curr Drug Targets. 2014; 15:762–770.

11. Cammarota G et al. Gut microbiota modulation: probiotics, antibiotics or fecal microbiota transplantation? Intern Emerg Med. 2014; 9:365–373. doi: 10.1007/s11739-014-1069-4.

12. Lederberg J. Infectious history. Science. 2000; 288:287–293.

13. Ladizinski B et al. The human skin microbiome. Int J Dermatol. 2014; 53:1177–1179.

14. Peterson J. et al. The NIH human microbiome project. Genome Res. 2009; 19:2317–2323.

15. Grice EA et al. Topographical and temporal diversity of the human skin microbiome. Science. 2009; 324:1190–1192.

16. Grice EA, Segre JA. The skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011; 9:244–253

17. Consortium HMP. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012; 486:207–214.

18. Singh P et al. Intestinal microbial communities associated with acute enteric infections and disease recovery. Microbiome. 2015; 3:45. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0109-2.

19. Zilber-Rosenberg I, Rosenberg E. Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome theory of evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008; 32:723–735.

20. Gill SR et al. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science. 2006; 312:1355–1359.

21. Oh J et al. Temporal stability of the human skin microbiome. Cell. 2016; 165:854–866. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.008.

22. Sanford JA, Gallo RL. Functions of the skin microbiota in health and disease. Semin Immunol. 2013; 25:370–377.

23. Zeeuwen PL et al. Microbiome and skin diseases. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013; 13:514–520.

24. Nakatsuji T et al. The microbiome extends to subepidermal compartments of normal skin. Nat Commun. 2013; 4:1431.

25. Schommer NN, Gallo RL. Structure and function of the human skin microbiome. Trend in Mikrobiology. 2013; 21(12):660–668. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.10.001.

26. Belkaid Y, Segre JA. Dialogue between skin microbiota and immunity. Science. 2014; 346:954–959.

27. Findley K et al. Topographic diversity of fungal and bacterial communities in human skin. Nature. 2013; 498:367–370.

28. Rosenthal M et al. Skin microbiota: microbial community structure and its potential association with health and disease. Infect Genet Evol. 2011; 11:839–848.

29. James AG et al. Microbiological and biochemical origins of human axillary odour. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013; 83:527–540.

30. Fitz-Gibbon S et al. Propionibacterium acnes strain populations in the human skin microbiome associated with acne. The Journal of investiga-tive dermatology. 2013; 133:2152–2160.

31. Gioti A et al. Genomic insights into the atopic eczema-associated skin commensal yeast Malassezia sympodialis. mBio. 2013; 4:00572–00512.

32. Paulino LC et al.Analysis of Malassezia microbiota in healthy superficial human skin and in psoriatic lesions by multiplex real-time PCR. FEMS yeast research. 2008; 8:460–471.

33. Xu J et al. Dandruff-associated Malassezia genomes reveal convergent and divergent virulence traits shared with plant and human fungal patho-gen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007; 104:18730–18735.

34. Lacey N et al. Demodex mites--commensals, parasites or mutualistic organisms? Dermatology. 2011; 222:128–130.

35. Lacey N et al. Under the lash: Demodex mites in human diseases. The biochemist. 2009; 31:2–6.

36. Foulongne V et al.Human skin microbiota: high diversity of DNA viruses identified on the human skin by high throughput sequencing. PloS one. 2012; 7:38499.

37. Singh S et al. The role of human endogenous retroviruses in melanoma. The British journal of dermatology. 2009; 161:1225–1231.

38. Rosenthal M et al. Skin microbiota: microbial community structure and its potential association with health and disease. Infection, genetics and evolution: journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases. 2011; 11839–11848.

39. Antonsson A et al. Prevalence and type spectrum of human papillomaviruses in healthy skin samples collected in three continents. The Journal of general virology. 2003; 84:1881–1886.

40. Delwart EL Viral metagenomics. Reviews in medical virology. 2007; 17:115–131.

41. Salava A, Lauerma A. Role of the skin microbiome in atopic dermatitis. Clin Transl Allergy. 2014; 4:33.

42. Sanchez DA, Nosanchuk JD, Friedman AJ. The skin microbiome: is there a role in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis? J Drugs Dermatol. 2015; 14:127–130.

43. Seite S, Bieber T. Barrier function and microbiotic dysbiosis in atopic dermatitis. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015; 8:479–483.

44. Williams MR, Gallo RL. The role of the skin microbiome in atopic dermatitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015; 15:65.

45. Fitz-Gibbon S et al. Propionibacterium acnes strain populations in the human skin microbiome associated with acne. J Invest Dermatol. 2013; 133:2152–2160.

46. Weyrich LS et al. The skin microbiome: associations between altered microbial communities and disease. Australas J Dermatol. 2015; 56:268–274.

47. Clavaud C et al.Dandruff is associated with disequilibrium in the proportion of the major bacterial and fungal populations colonizing the scalp. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8:58203.

48. Wang L et al. Characterization of the major bacterial-fungal populations colonizing dandruff scalps in Shanghai, China, shows microbial dis-equilibrium. Exp Dermatol. 2015; 24:398–400.

49. Holmes AD et al.Dermatological adverse events associated with topical brimonidine gel 0.33% in subjects with erythema of rosacea: a retro-spective review of clinical studies. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015; 8:29–35.

50. Zapata HJ, Quagliarello VJ. The microbiota and microbiome in aging: potential implications in health and age-related diseases. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015; 63:776–781.

51. Holmes CJ et al. Dynamic role of host stress responses in modulating the cutaneous microbiome: implications for wound healing and infection. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015; 4:24–37.

52. Napolitano NA, Mahapatra T, Tang W. The effectiveness of UV-C radiation for facility-wide environmental disinfection to reduce health care-acquired infections. Am J Infect Control. 2015; 43:1342–1346.

53. Maclean M et al. 405 nm light technology for the inactivation of pathogens and its potential role for environmental disinfection and infection control. J Hosp Infect. 2014; 88:1–11.

54. Microbial Wilson M. Inhabitants of Humans: Their Ecology and Role In Health And Disease. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 2005.

55. Rocha LA et al.Changes in hands microbiota associated with skin damage because of hand hygiene procedures on the health care workers. Am J Infect Control. 2009; 37:155–159.

56. Stingley RL et al. Metabolism of azo dyes by human skin microbiota. J Med Microbiol. 2010; 59(1):108–114.

57. Turnbaugh PJ et al. The human microbiome project. Nature. 2007; 449:804–810.

58. Holland KT. Bojar RA. Cosmetics: what is their influence on the skin microflora? Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002; 3:445–449.

59. Leccia MT et al. Topical acne treatments in Europe and the issue of antimicrobial resistance. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015; 29:1485–1492.

60. Langdon A, Crook N, Dantas G. The effects of antibiotics on the microbiome throughout development and alternative approaches for therapeutic modulation. Genome Med. 2016; 8:39.

61. Bensadoun RJ et al. Daily baseline skin care in the prevention, treatment, and supportive care of skin toxicity in oncology patients: recommenda-tions from a multinational expert panel. Cancer Manag Res. 2013; 5:401–408.

62. Giacomoni PU et al. Gender-linked differences in human skin. Journal of dermatological science. 2009; 55:144–149.

63. Nishijima S et al. The gut microbiome of healthy Japanese and its microbial and functional uniqueness. DNA Res. 2016; 23:125–133.

64. Caramia G, Atzei A, Fanos V. Probiotics and the skin. Clinics in Dermatology. 2008; 26:4–11.

65. Ouwehand AC, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Probiotics: an overview of beneficial effects. Antonie van Leuwenhoek. 2002; 82:279–289.

66. Guenche A et al. Supplementation with oral probiotic bacteria maintains cutaneous immune homeostasis after UV exposure. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2006; 16:511–517.

67. Probiotics – Promising Cosmetic Ingredient or Marketing Tool? // URL: (viewed on: 15.08.2017)

68. FAO Technical Meeting Report on PREBIOTICS: Food Quality and Standards Service (AGNS) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO. 2008.

69. Haberer P et al. Practical criteria for selection and judgement of lactic acid bacteria as probiotics. IDF Nutr. Newslett. 1996; 145:36.

70. Shah N P. Probiotic bacteria: selective enumeration and survival in dairy foods. J. Dairy Sci. 2000; 4:894–907.

71. Biavati B, Bottazzi V, Morelli L. Probiotics and Bifidobacteria. Novara (Italy): MOFIN ALCE; 2001; 79.

72. Кігель НФ, Насирова ГФ. Крітерії відбору заквашувальних культур. Вісник аграрної науки. 2002; 2:58–60.

73. Reisch M.S. Cosmetics: The next microbiome frontier. Mitsui Chemicals Catalysis Science Award. 2017; 95(19):30–34.

74. Fuchs-Tarlovsky V et al. Probiotics in dermatologic practice. Nutrition. 2016; 32(3):289–295. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2015.09.001.

75. Goto K et al. Clinical and histopathological evaluation of Dermatophagoides farinae-induced dermatitis in NC/Nga mice orally administered Bacillus subtilis. J Vet Med Sci. 2011; 73(5):649–654.

76. Watanabe T et al. Oral administration of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional South Asian fermented milk 'dahi' inhibits the development of atopic dermatitis in NC/Nga mice. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol: Tokyo. 2009; 55(3):271–278.

77. Rosenfeldt V et al. Effect of probiotic Lactobacillus strains in children with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003; 111(2):389–395.

78. Elbe-Burger A et al. Overexpression of IL-4 alters the homeostasis in the skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2002; 118(5):767–778.

79. Stokes JH, Pillsbury DH. The effect on the skin of emotional and nervous states: theoretical and practical consideration of a gastrointestinal mechanism. Arch Dermatol Syphilol. 1930; 22:962–993.

80. Zhu DL et al. Meta analysis of lactic acid bacteria as probiotics for the primary prevention of infantile eczema. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2010; 12(9):734–739.

81. Kim HH et al. Eicosapentaenoic acid inhibits TNF-alpha-induced matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression in human keratinocytes, HaCaT cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008; 36:343–349.

82. Piccardi N, Manissier P. Nutrition and nutritional supplementation: Impact on skin health and beauty. Dermatoendocrinol. 2009; 1(5):271–274.

83. Segawa S et al.Oral administration of heat-killed Lactobacillus brevis SBC8803 ameliorates the development of dermatitis and inhibits immunoglobulin E production in atopic dermatitis model NC/Nga mice. Biol Pharm Bull. 2008; 31(5):884–889.

84. Gueniche A et al. Supplementation with oral probiotic bacteria maintains cutaneous immune homeostasis after UV exposure. Eur J Dermatol. 2006; 16(5):511–517.

85. Cinque B et al. Effect of Bifidobacterium infantis on Interferongamma-induced keratinocyte apoptosis: a potential therapeutic approach to skin immune abnormalities. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2006; 19(4):775–786. DOI: 10.1177/039463200601900407

86. Gagarina Iu. Krem: spasibo, chto zhivoi. Kosmetolog. 2016; 3:74–76.

87. Naoki I, Toshiro S. Cosmetic Ingredients Fermented by Lactic Acid Bacteria. Microbial Production. Springer, Tokyo. 2014; 233–242.

88. Cinque B et аl. Use of Probiotics for Dermal Applications. Probiotics. Microbiology Monographs. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011; 21:221–241.