##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Darboux theorem to more general context of Frechet manifolds we face an obstacle: in general vector fields do not have local flows. Recently, Fr\'{e}chet geometry has been developed in terms of projective limit of Banach manifolds.
In this framework under an appropriate Lipchitz condition The Darboux theorem asserts that a symplectic manifold $(M^{2n},\omega)$ is locally symplectomorphic to $(R^{2n}, \omega_0)$, where $\omega_0$ is the standard symplectic form on $R^{2n}$. This theorem was proved by Moser in 1965, the idea of proof, known as the Moser’s trick, works in many situations. The Moser tricks is to construct an appropriate isotopy $ \ff_t $ generated by a time-dependent vector field $ X_t $ on $M$ such that $ \ff_1^{*} \omega = \omega_0$. Nevertheless, it was showed by Marsden that Darboux theorem is not valid for weak symplectic Banach manifolds. However, in 1999 Bambusi showed that if we associate to each point of a Banach manifold a suitable Banach space (classifying space) via a given symplectic form then the Moser trick can be applied to obtain the theorem if the classifying space does not depend on the point of the manifold and a suitable smoothness condition holds.
If we want to try to generalize the local flows exist and with some restrictive conditions the Darboux theorem was proved by Kumar. In this paper we consider the category of so-called bounded Fr\'{e}chet manifolds and prove that in this category vector fields have local flows and following the idea of Bambusi we associate to each point of a manifold a Fr\'{e}chet space independent of the choice of the point and with the assumption of bounded smoothness on vector fields we prove the Darboux theorem.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Provided they are the owners of the copyright to their work, authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.
References
2. Dodson C. T. J. Some recent work in frechet geometry. Balkan J. Geometry and Its Applications. 2012. т. 17. С.6-21.
3. Eftekharinasab К. Geometry of bounded frechet manifolds. Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics. 2016. т. 46.№.3. С.895-913,
4. Kalton N. J., Swanson R. C. A symplectic banach space with no lagrangian sub-spaces. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 1982. т. 273. №.1. 385-392.
5. Kumar P.. Darboux chart on projective limit of weak symplectic banach manifold. Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 2015. т. 12. №.7.
6. Michor P. W., Kriegl A.. The Convenient Setting of Global Analysis: Mathematical Surveys and Monographs., usa.1997.
7. Muller O. A metric approach to frechet geometry. Journal of Geometry and physics.2008. т. 58. С.1477-1500.
8. Neeb K-H.. Nancy lectures on infinite dimensional Lie groups: Lecture Notes. 2002.
9. Neeb K-H. Toward a lie theory of locally convex groups. Jpn. J. Math. 2006. т.2. с 291-468.
10. Osborne S. Locally convex spaces: volume 269 of Graduate text in mathematics, 2014.
11. Perez Carreras J., Bonet J. Barrelled locally convex spaces: volume 113 of North-Holand mathematics studies . North-Holand, 1987.
12. Weinstein A. Symplectic manifolds and their lagrangian submanifolds. Advances in Math. 1971. т. 6, C. 329-346.